Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Syed Dhasthakeer vs Navab John on 14 September, 2012
37. On the other hand, Mr.S.S.Sundar, learned counsel appearing for the
plaintiffs, has submitted that as observed by the learned Single Judge of this
Court in Syed Dhasthakeer vs. Navab John, reported in 2012 (6) CTC 892, a suit
can be maintained without seeking the relief of declaration of title. This
Court has carefully gone through the above cited decision and found that this
decision is not made applicable to the instant case on hand.
The Victoria Edward Hall Rep. By Its ... vs M. Samraj And 5 Others on 30 April, 2001
In order to fortify his contention, he has also made reference to another
decision in The Victoria Edward Hall v. M.Samraj, reported in 2001 (3) CTC 129.
In this case, a suit was filed seeking the relief of declaration that voters
list of 2000-01 is incorrect and invalid and the election held based on such
voter's list is null and void. The said suit was relating to the right of
nearly 800 persons, whose membership was disputed. If such declaration is
granted, the persons, who are not parties to the suit would be prejudiced and
therefore it is held by the learned single Judge of this Court that the Court
should follow the procedure set out in Order I Rule 8. Even if the defendants
do not take such objections as interested of persons, who are not present before
the Court, is likely to be affected.
B.Nemi Chand Jain vs G.Ravindran on 27 January, 2010
45. Mr.S.S.Sundar, learned counsel, while advancing his arguments, has also made
reliance upon the decision in B.Nemi Chand Jain v. G.Ravindran, reported in 2010
(2) CTC 751. This decision is also not made applicable to the present case on
hand.
Section 100 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1