Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.21 seconds)G.Ganesan vs J.Surendran on 2 December, 2004
In (2005) 1 MadLJ 191 (G. Ganesan v.
J. Surendran), the Court opined that a petition as an obstructor
without any document or material to show that he was in actual
possession of premises cannot be filed. It is further held that
except for a bare statement that they are in possession of the
suit property, no other material was filed to show their actual
possession prima-facie. Such petitions are not maintainable at all.
1 6 . In AIR 2004 Madras 249 (R. Devadass v . Subordinate
Judge, Ponneri), the Court opined as under:-
C. Some Gowda vs C. Ranga Rao And Ors. on 3 December, 2003
NOC 293 (C. Some
Gowda v. C. Ranga Rao), the High Court opined that a person
raising objection must show some prim a-facie material in
support of his objection.
1