Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.35 seconds)Kailash vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 3 March, 2008
In the case law Kailash Vs. State of Rajasthan and Another AIR 2008 Supreme Court 1564 Hon'ble Apex Court has held in Paragraphs- 9 that:-
Michael Machado & Anr vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr on 17 February, 2000
In case of Michael Machado and Another Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another AIR 2000 Supreme Court 1127 that Paragraphs- 12.
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Earabhadrappa Alias Krishnappa vs State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 1983
15. The court should apply the aforesaid power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. springily and in appropriate case It has been held by Hon'ble Apex Court in Krishnappa Vs. State of Karnataka AIR 2004 Supreme Court 4298, in Paragraphs- 6 that:-
Rajesh & Ors Etc vs State Of Haryana on 3 February, 2014
In this context, Hon'ble Apex Court has held in Rajesh and Others (Supra), in Paragraphs- 83, 84 and 85 as under:-
Smt. Rani Zahir Ahmad And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 1 February, 2006
17. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 7 has submitted that opposite party nos. 2 to 7 are residing separately with other accused person, the court has recorded the evidence of complainant only and no specific role of opposite party nos. 2 to 7 has been assigned either in F.I.R. or in evidence of examination-in-chief of P.w.1. Therefore, it is not be justified to summon accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. only on suspicion as it has been held in the case of Smt. Rani Zahir Ahmad and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Another 2006 CriLJ 1757.