Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.24 seconds)Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 452 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Hardeep Singh vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 10 January, 2014
14. In the first information report or in the statements recorded under Section 161 of the Code, the names of the appellants or any other description has not been given so as to identify them. The allegations in the FIR are vague and can be used any time to include any person in the absence of description in the first information report to identify such person. There is no assertion in respect of the villages to which the additional accused belong. Therefore, there is no strong or cogent evidence to make the appellants stand the trial for the offences under Sections 147, 448, 294(b) and 506 IPC in view of the judgment in Hardeep Singh case [Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab, (2014) 3 SCC 92 : (2014) 2 SCC (Cri) 86] . The additional accused cannot be summoned under Section 319 of the Code in casual and cavalier manner in the absence of strong and cogent evidence. Under Section 319 of the Code additional accused can be summoned only if there is more than prima facie case as is required at the time of framing of charge but which is less than the satisfaction required at the time of conclusion of the trial convicting the accused."
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The State Of M.P vs Amichand Agrawal And Ors. 32 ... on 6 September, 2018
28. In the present case, learned trial Court has not considered overwhelming evidence collected by the investigating officer during the course of investigation which would demonstrate that the present revisionist was not present at the time and place of occurrence. I find order impugned herein is unsustainable and against the law. Thus, this revision is allowed and order dated 3.03.2020 passed by the Addl Sessions Judge, Court No.11, Hardoi in S.T. No.111 of 2018: State vs Pawan Singh and Ors. arising out of Crime No.267 of 2017 under Sections 452, 302, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kachauna, Hardoi is hereby quashed.