Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.33 seconds)

S.S.Chheena vs Vijay Kumar Mahajan & Anr on 12 August, 2010

30. That the intention of the legislature is that in order to convict a person under Section 306 IPC, there has to be a clear mens rea to commit an offence and that there ought to be an active or direct act leading the deceased to commit suicide, being left with no option, had been propounded by this Court in S.S. Chheena vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan (2010) 12 SCC 190.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 547 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs State Of Gujarat on 9 September, 2013

In Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal vs. State of Gujarat (2013) 10 SCC 48, this Court, with reference to Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, while observing that the criminal law amendment bringing forth this provision was necessitated to meet the social challenge of saving the married woman from being ill-treated or forcing to commit suicide by the husband or his relatives demanding dowry, it was underlined that the burden of proving the preconditions permitting the presumption as ingrained therein, squarely and singularly lay on the prosecution. That the prosecution as well has to establish beyond reasonable doubt that 20 the deceased had committed suicide on being abetted by the person charged under Section 306 IPC, was emphasised.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 111 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1   2 Next