Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.33 seconds)
Darshanaben Kanaiyalal Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 30 March, 2021 cites

Saurav Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 18 December, 2020

21. So far as the reliance placed by the learned senior advocate for the petitioners on the judgment of this Court in the case of Tamannaben Ashokbhai Desai (supra); cited with approval in the case of Saurav Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh (supra) by the Apex Court is concerned, the principle laid down therein, cannot be made applicable to the facts of the present case for the reasons discussed herein after.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 35 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Tamannaben Ashokbhai Desai vs Shital Amrutlal Nishar on 5 August, 2020

21. So far as the reliance placed by the learned senior advocate for the petitioners on the judgment of this Court in the case of Tamannaben Ashokbhai Desai (supra); cited with approval in the case of Saurav Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh (supra) by the Apex Court is concerned, the principle laid down therein, cannot be made applicable to the facts of the present case for the reasons discussed herein after.
Gujarat High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 16 - V Nath - Full Document

The State Of Madras vs Srimathi Champakam Dorairajanandthe ... on 9 April, 1951

58. There is no reservation for posts in the General Category, and horizontal reservation in favour of women in the General Category is available to be filled up from amongst all women irrespective of their caste status. The posts, reserved in favour of General Category (Women), are available for all women from the State of Gujarat, and that would include women belonging to the reserved categories such as OBCs, SCs and STs, and women who do not. Holding otherwise, would result in surreptitious introduction of reservation in favour of those who do not Page 23 of 26 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 13 13:55:32 IST 2022 C/SCA/17897/2017 JUDGMENT belong to the socially and educationally backward classes, and a disguised attempt at communal reservation has been frowned upon by the Supreme Court in The State of Madras Vs. Sm. Champakam Dorairajan and another : AIR 1951 SC 226"
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 250 - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Daria vs Rajasthan Public Service Commission & ... on 18 July, 2007

6.5 It is further submitted that once the waitlist for SEBC candidates, without being gender specific is prepared and when incidentally all females find their place in the list, because no male candidate beyond 35 marks is available at all, the list has to be operated when there are vacancies in the SEBC category in addition to 8 remaining unfilled because of non-availability of male candidates beyond 27th position. It is further submitted that if after the last SEBC male candidate, if no further SEBC male candidates were available, to be offered appointment, it was the petitioners, who would be given Page 7 of 26 Downloaded on : Thu Jan 13 13:55:32 IST 2022 C/SCA/17897/2017 JUDGMENT appointment inasmuch as, there is nobody in the wait list above the petitioners. Reliance is placed by the GPSC on the judgment in the case of Rajesh Kumar Daria vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Ors. reported in (2007) 8 SCC 785 which is misplaced because, the say of the petitioners is that they are in the list and since no male candidates are available, the petitioners be offered appointment. It is submitted that all that the petitioners want is operation of the waiting list considering the fact that 8 vacancies are there and 3 more have arisen owing to the rejection of the candidature of the 3 candidates.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 495 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1