Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 72 (1.56 seconds)

Ram Krishna Verma Etc. Etc vs State Of U.P. And Ors. Etc. Etc on 31 March, 1992

328, para 13) “13. … [the] stay granted by the court does not confer a right upon a party and it is granted always subject to the final result of the matter in the court and at the risks and costs of the party obtaining the stay. After the dismissal, of the lis, the party concerned is relegated to the position which existed prior to the filing of the petition in the court which had granted the stay. Grant of stay does not automatically amount to extension of a statutory protection.” ’ ” There are other decisions as well, which iterate and apply the same principle. [Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, (2011) 8 SCC 161; Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. CIT, (1980) 2 SCC 191; Ram Krishna 61 Verma v. State of U.P., (1992) 2 SCC 620.
Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 138 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next