Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 67 (0.68 seconds)Section 8 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Tilokchand Motichand & Ors vs H.B. Munshi & Anr on 22 November, 1968
47. Hidayatullah, C.J. who agreed with Bachawat and Mitter, JJ. in
Tilokchand case {(1969) 1 SCC 110 } noted that no period of limitation has
been prescribed for filing a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution and
proceeded to observe: (SCC p. 116, para 11)
"11. Therefore, the question is one of discretion for this Court to follow
from case to case. There is no lower limit and there is no upper limit. A
case may be brought within the Limitation Act by reason of some article but
this Court need not necessarily give the total time to the litigant to move
this Court under Article 32. Similarly in a suitable case this Court may
entertain such a petition even after a lapse of time. It will all depend on what
the breach of the fundamental right and the remedy claimed are when and
how the delay arose."
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Bhailal Bhai & Ors on 20 January, 1964
57. If the petitioner wants to invoke jurisdiction of a writ court, he should
come to the Court at the earliest reasonably possible opportunity.
Inordinate delay in making the motion for a writ will indeed be a good
ground for refusing to exercise such discretionary jurisdiction. The
underlying object of this principle is not to encourage agitation of stale
claims and exhume matters which have already been disposed of or
settled or where the rights of third parties have accrued in the meantime
(vide State of M.P. v. Bhailal Bhai, Moon Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Court (AIR
1967 1450) and Bhoop Singh v. Union of India { (1992) 3 SCC 136}.
Section 12 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Chairman, U.P.Jal Nigam & Anr vs Jaswant Singh & Anr on 10 November, 2006
52. On the basis of the decisions of the Supreme Court referred to above,
the relevant considerations that may be taken into account in determining
the issue of delay and laches may be summarized thus:
The Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Jeedimetla ... vs Sri.K.Janannath Reddy K.J.Reddy, ... on 21 January, 2022
I n Adi
Reddy's case the legal position in regard to condoning of delay in the light
of the law laid down by the Supreme Court was not dealt with.