Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.03 seconds)State Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr vs Nalla Raja Reddy & Ors on 28 February, 1967
ANNOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURTON (SAUMYA CHAUHAN)
24th December 2014 MM-07(West)/ Tis Hazari Court
State v. Raju @ Raja @ Vicky U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act 7/7
FIR No. 156/07 PS Paschim Vihar
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Kuldeep Singh vs State Of Haryana on 8 February, 1996
Similarly it was
held in the case of Kuldeep Singh V. State of Haryana 2004(4) RCR 103 and
Passi @ Prakash V. State of Haryana 2001(1) RCR 435, that whenever any
recovery in connection with the place of the commission of offence is made,
public persons must be made witness.
Roop Chand & Anr. Etc. vs State Of Haryana . on 4 April, 2014
In "Roop Chand v. State of Haryana" reported in 1990(1) CLR 69, it was
observed that such explanations that the public persons refused to join the
State v. Raju @ Raja @ Vicky U/s 25/54/59 Arms Act 4/4
FIR No. 156/07 PS Paschim Vihar
proceedings are unreliable.
Pradeep Narayan Madgonkar Etc. Etc. vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 May, 1995
In case of "Pradeep Narayana V. State of
Maharashtra" reported AIR 1995 Supreme Court 1930, it was held that failure
of police to join witness from locality during search creates doubt about fairness
of the investigation, benefit of which has to go to the accused.
1