Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.21 seconds)Article 105 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 101 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
A. K. Roy, Etc vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 December, 1981
In support of the aforesaid grounds, the decisions of 'A.K. Roy
vs. Union of India' 1982(1) SCC 271, 'Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu'
2011(5) SCC 244 and 'Ameena Begum vs. State of Telangana & others'
2023 (9) SCC 587 have been relied upon.
Ameena Begum vs The State Of Telangana on 4 September, 2023
In support of the aforesaid grounds, the decisions of 'A.K. Roy
vs. Union of India' 1982(1) SCC 271, 'Rekha vs. State of Tamil Nadu'
2011(5) SCC 244 and 'Ameena Begum vs. State of Telangana & others'
2023 (9) SCC 587 have been relied upon.
K. Anandan Nambiar And Another vs Chief Secretary, Government Of Madras ... on 27 October, 1965
6. Article 105 of Constitution has been subjected to judicial
scrutiny on various occasions right from the case of 'K. Anandan Nambiar
& another vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madras & others' (1966) 2 SCR
406; 'Keshav Singh vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly & others' AIR 1965
(SC) 745, 'Smt.
Keshav Singh vs Speaker, Legislative Assembly And Ors. on 10 March, 1965
6. Article 105 of Constitution has been subjected to judicial
scrutiny on various occasions right from the case of 'K. Anandan Nambiar
& another vs. Chief Secretary, Govt. of Madras & others' (1966) 2 SCR
406; 'Keshav Singh vs. Speaker, Legislative Assembly & others' AIR 1965
(SC) 745, 'Smt.
Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Shri Raj Narain & Anr on 7 November, 1975
Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Raj Narain' 1975 (Supp)
SCC 1, 'Tej Kiran Jain & others vs. N. Sanjiva Reddy & others' AIR 1971
Delhi 86 to the recent case of 'Shekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others'
2009 SCC OnLine All 485. It has been categorically held in all these
authoritative decisions that no higher or special right is available to a
preventively detained sitting Member of Parliament, than an ordinary
citizen. Therefore, a sitting Member of Parliament as well as a common man
would be subjected to the same privileges and obligations as contained in
Section 15 of NSA.
Tej Kiran Jain And Others vs N. Sanjiva Reddy And Others on 8 May, 1970
Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Shri Raj Narain' 1975 (Supp)
SCC 1, 'Tej Kiran Jain & others vs. N. Sanjiva Reddy & others' AIR 1971
Delhi 86 to the recent case of 'Shekhar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & others'
2009 SCC OnLine All 485. It has been categorically held in all these
authoritative decisions that no higher or special right is available to a
preventively detained sitting Member of Parliament, than an ordinary
citizen. Therefore, a sitting Member of Parliament as well as a common man
would be subjected to the same privileges and obligations as contained in
Section 15 of NSA.