Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.39 seconds)
State vs . Rakesh on 21 July, 2023 cites

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Dr. (Smt.) Kiran Agrawal 11 Wa/255/2017 ... on 1 October, 2018

18. The star witnesses of prosecution are the injured person/ PW-6 HC Hardeep and eye-witnesses PW-4 ASI Rajeshwar and PW-8 SI Magender. The testimonies of these witnesses have remained consistent qua the manner in which the incident had happened and the defence has not been able to shake the veracity of their statement or to impeach their credibility. The testimony of remaining witnesses have remained FIR No. 204/1999 State Vs. Rakesh PS: Dilshad Garden Page no. 11 of 16 consistent and there is no major discrepancy in the testimony of prosecution witnesses.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 134 - Full Document

Gurinder Mohan Singh Sambhi & Ors vs The State ( Nct Of Delhi) on 7 February, 2017

It is not the case that complaint u/s 195 CrPC was not filed in the present case and as such the judgment relied upon by the accused i.e. Gurinder Singh v State 1996 (2) CC Cases 396 (HC) would not be applicable in the facts of this case as in that specific case there was no complaint at all u/s 195 CrPC. The court finds itself in agreement with the submission of Ld. APP for State as it is settled that non filing of formal complaint under section 195 Cr.P.C will not vitiate proceeding in respect of offence under section 332 and 353 of IPC.
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 11 - M Gupta - Full Document

Yogesh Singh vs Mahabeer Singh & Ors on 20 October, 2016

23. The discrepancies in the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses pointed out by ld. Counsel for the accused persons are in my reasoned opinion, minor in nature and do not hit at the case of the prosecution. The Apex court in Yogesh Singh vs. Mahabeer Singh & Ors. [Criminal Appeal No. 1482 of 2013] observed that, "minor discrepancies are not to be given undue emphasis and the evidence is to be considered from the point of view of trustworthiness. The test is whether the same inspires confidence in the mind of the Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 78 - Cited by 321 - P C Ghosh - Full Document
1   2 Next