Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (1.52 seconds)Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Morinda Co-Op. Sugar Mills Ltd vs Ram Kishan And Others Etc on 25 August, 1995
In Morinda Coop.Sugar Mills
Ltd. v. Ram Kishan, in para 3, this
Court has dealt with engagement of the
seasonal workman in sugarcane crushing;
in para 4 it is stated that it was not a
case of retrenchment of the workman, but
of closure of the factory after the
crushing season was over. Accordingly,
in para 5, it was held that it is not
'retrenchment' within the meaning of
Section 2(oo) of the Act. As a
consequence the appellant is not
entitled to retrenchment as per clause
(bb) of Section 2(oo) of the Act. Since
the present work is seasonal business,
the principles of the Act have no
application. However, this Court has
directed that the respondent management
should maintain a register and engage
the workmen when the season starts in
the succeeding years in the order of
seniority. Until all the employees whose
names appear in the list are engaged in
addition to the employees who are
already working, the management should
not go in for fresh engagement of new
workmen. It would be incumbent upon the
respondent management to adopt such
procedure as is enumerated above."
Anil Bapurao Kanase vs Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd & ... on 7 May, 1997
The position was re-iterated by a three-Judge Bench of
this Court Court in Anil Bapurao Kanase v. Krishna Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Anr. (1997 (10) SCC 599). It was
noted as follows:
Batala Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd vs Sowaran Singh on 7 October, 2005
Recently the question was examined in Batala
Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Sowaran Singh (2005 (7)
Supreme 165).
1