Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.45 seconds)Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 149 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Sanjay @ Kaka Shri Nawabuddin @ Nawab ... vs The State (N.C.T. Of Delhi) on 7 February, 2001
(38) Hon'ble Apex Court in Sanjay @ Kaka vs. State of NCT of Delhi reported in U.P. Criminal Rules 2007 (323) has held that if a fact is actually discovered in consequence of information given, same guarantee is afforded thereby that the information was true and accordingly it can be safely allowed to be given in evidence.
Sadhu Ram & Another vs The State Of Rajasthan on 10 April, 2003
(32) In view of law laid down by the Apex Court in Sadhu Ram and another vs. State of Rajasthan; 2003 (46) ACC 993 (SC), there is no legal impediment in recording a conviction on evidence of a single witness. The rule of prudence, however, demands that such single testimony should be free from blemish and should also be adequate one. If such testimony is also corroborated by the medical evidence, prompt F.I.R., and other circumstances, then it can be safely acted upon for recording a conviction.
Abdul Razak & Ors vs The State Of Karnataka R/By Sho,Hutti Ps on 15 May, 2015
(22) The appellants' counsel has also placed reliance on the Apex Court judgment reported in Abdul Razak and others vs. State of Karnataka represented by Station Officer, Hutti Police Station, (2015) 6 Supreme Court Cases 282. The facts of the case has no relevance with present facts of the case.