Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)

Gomathy Ammal Gomathy Ammal vs Rukmini Amma Padmavathi Amma And Ors. on 1 February, 1966

21. It is true that generally when there is a conflict between area and boundary, the boundary will prevail. However, as held in the decision in Savithri Ammal (supra) and Chandrakumar (supra), the above rule is not an inflexible one. In the present case, the properties of the defendants could be clearly identified using the boundaries given in Exts.A2 and A3, while it could not be identified using the area given in the document. In the above circumstances, it is to be held that in the present case, the principle that "when there is conflict between area and boundary, boundary will prevail" squarely applies.
Kerala High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 20 - Full Document

Iqbal Basith vs N. Subbalakshmi . on 14 December, 2020

In the above circumstances, an adverse inference is liable to be drawn against the defendants under illustration (g) to Section 114 of the Indian Evidence Act [Ramesh Kumar & Anr.v Furu Ram & Anr. 2011 KHC 4718; Iqbal Basith and Others v. N. Subbalakshni and Others, 2020 KHC 6709]. In the facts and circumstance of the case, non-examination of the plaintiffs is also crucial and fatal to the plaintiff's case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 32 - N Sinha - Full Document

Chandrakumar vs Narayana Bahuleyan on 24 March, 2011

21. It is true that generally when there is a conflict between area and boundary, the boundary will prevail. However, as held in the decision in Savithri Ammal (supra) and Chandrakumar (supra), the above rule is not an inflexible one. In the present case, the properties of the defendants could be clearly identified using the boundaries given in Exts.A2 and A3, while it could not be identified using the area given in the document. In the above circumstances, it is to be held that in the present case, the principle that "when there is conflict between area and boundary, boundary will prevail" squarely applies.
Kerala High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 4 - K T Sankaran - Full Document
1