Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.25 seconds)Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
G. Narayanaswamy Reddy (Dead) Byl.Rs. ... vs Govt. Of Karnataka And Anr on 29 April, 1991
In the case of G. Narayanaswamy Reddy vs.
Government of Karnataka [(1991) 3 SCC 261], wherein the Hon'ble
Supreme Court of India held that "In our view, the said interim orders have
a direct bearing on the question raised and the non-disclosure of the same
certainly amounts to suppression of material facts. On this ground alone,
the special leave petitions are liable to be rejected".
Section 9 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Hari Narain vs Badri Das on 4 March, 1963
In Hari
Narain v. Badri Das [AIR 1963 SC 1558] , the Court
revoked the leave granted to the appellant and
observed: (AIR p. 1558)
“It is of utmost importance that in
making material statements and setting
forth grounds in applications for special
leave made under Article 136 of the
18/33
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.A.No.996 of 2019 in ELP.No.5 of 2019
Constitution, care must be taken not to
make any statements which are
inaccurate, untrue or misleading. In
dealing with applications for special
leave, the Court naturally takes
statements of fact and grounds of fact
contained in the petitions at their face
value and it would be unfair to betray
the confidence of the Court by making
statements which are untrue and
misleading. Thus, if at the hearing of the
appeal the Supreme Court is satisfied
that the material statements made by
the appellant in his application for
special leave are inaccurate and
misleading, and the respondent is
entitled to contend that the appellant
may have obtained special leave from
the Supreme Court on the strength of
what he characterises as
misrepresentations of facts contained in
the petition for special leave, the
Supreme Court may come to the
conclusion that in such a case special
leave granted to the appellant ought to
be revoked.”
19/33
http://www.judis.nic.in
O.A.No.996 of 2019 in ELP.No.5 of 2019
Section 7 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Dalip Singh vs State Of U.P. & Ors on 3 December, 2009
In this point, the
learned counsel for the second respondent cited the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Dalip Singh vs. State of
U.P., [(2010) 2 SCC 114], wherein in paragraph-24, it has been held as
follows:-