Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Companies Act, 1956
Section 14 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Vijay Power Generators Ltd. vs Sumit Seth on 9 May, 2014
In this view of the matter, I am also supported by the
judgment of the Delhi High Court in Vijay Power Generators Ltd.
vs. Sumit Seth, 2014 All M.R. (Cri.) Journal 305, wherein also it
has been held that unless the partnership firm is prosecuted and
convicted, the partner thereof cannot be convicted with the aid of
section 141 of the NI Act.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Union Of India & Ors vs Dhanwanti Devi & Ors on 21 August, 1996
11. On the issue of rules relating to binding precedents,
ABS 9 of 14
::: Uploaded on - 30/01/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2016 00:01:35 :::
WP 2909-2013-J
learned counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon two judgments
of the Apex Court in the cases of Union of India vs. Dhanwanti
Devi, (1996) 6 SCC 44 and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Raj
Kumari & Ors., AIR 2008 SC 403, which elaborate the
circumstances when a judgment can be said to be a binding
precedent.
Dulichand Lakshminarayan vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Nagpur on 17 February, 1956
To substantiate his
contention, learned counsel for respondent no.1 has relied upon a
landmark judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Dulichand
Laxminarayan vs. CIT, AIR 1956 SC 354, which has laid down that
a partnership firm cannot be equated with a company as it is not a
corporate entity nor a separate juristic person.