Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)

Harnandan Prasad vs B. Kamta Prasad Kakkar And Anr. on 23 October, 1933

In these circum-stances, following the principle of the decision in the case in Harnandan Prasad v. Kamta Prasad A.I.R. 1934 All. 376, we hold that the plaintiff is not entitled to a declaration that he is the duly elected member of the United Provinces Court of Wards from the Agra Province Zamindars Association instead of defendant 1. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff maintained that his client is entitled however to a declaration that defendant 1, Gajadhar Prasad, is not the duly elected representative of the Association on the Court of Wards. No specific prayer is included in the plaint to which such a declaration could be referred. Prayer (c) however is in the following terms : "Any other relief which in the circumstances of the case is just and proper, be granted to the plaintiff." We are of the opinion that this prayer covers the declaration for which learned Counsel for the plaintiff now presses.
Allahabad High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1