Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.21 seconds)Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 202 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Bharat Parikh vs C.B.I. And Anr on 14 July, 2008
Therefore, principle laid
down in the case of Bharat Parikh (supra) is not applicable to the
facts of this case.
Inder Mohan Goswami & Another vs State Of Uttaranchal & Others on 9 October, 2007
On the contrary, however, the principle laid down
in the case of AIR 2008 SC 251, Inder Mohan Goswami and
another Vs. State of Uttaranchal and others is applicable to the
facts of this case. In this case also, there was no dishonest intention of
the applicant at the time of entering into an agreement with the
6
applicant. Mere fact that he could not keep his promise later on it
cannot be presumed that he all along had a culpable intention to
break the promise from the beginning.
Mrs. Namrata Chopra vs Mr. Ashfaq Ahmed Qureshi on 15 March, 2012
In this context he placed reliance on I.LR (2012) MP 1766,
Namrata Chopra (Mrs.) Vs. Mr. Ashfaz Ahmed Qureshi. It is
further submitted that a Civil Suit is also pending between the parties
vide AnnexureA/3 wherein applicant/defendant and one of the
plaintiff had entered into a compromise, therefore, this matter was of
a civil nature. If applicant failed to honour an agreement to sell the
land, he cannot be said to have committed the offence of cheating. He
placed reliance on 2008 (III) MPJR 197, Tej Singh & others
Vs.Rewa Ram & others.
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1