Prosunno Coomar Roy vs The Secretary Of State For India In ... on 2 May, 1899
Finally with regard, to the contention of learned Counsel that the kabuliyat of 1836 gives the settlement-holders hereditary and transferable rights and that the case of Prosunno Coomar Roy v. The Secretary of State for India 26 C. 792; 3 C.W.N. 695 (the Ramoo case) is distinguishable because in that case the Settlement Officer's proceedings were declared ultra vires, we may indicate that we cannot give any force to the allegations of the original settlement-holders in face of the settlement rubkari which is entirely in order and in no way ultra vires.