Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (4.17 seconds)
Asthan-E-Khadri Trust, Bangalore And ... vs Karnataka State Board Of Wakfs, ... on 8 February, 2000
cites
The Wakf Act, 1995
Section 92 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
State Wakf Board, Madras vs Abdul Azeez Sahib And Ors. on 30 March, 1966
In support of these contentions, the learned Counsel relies upon the decision of this Court in the case of Karnataka Board of Wakfs v Masjid Aga and Another, Karnataka Board of Wakfs v Janab Abdul Azeez and the law laid down by Apex Court in the case of M.C. Mehta v Union of India.
Section 3 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Section 43 in The Wakf Act, 1995 [Entire Act]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India & Ors on 30 December, 1996
22. 'Notice' means information, an advice or written warning, in more or less formal shape intended to appraise a person of some proceeding in which his interests are involved. Natural justice requires that persons to be directly affected by acts, decisions or proceedings of any authority be given adequate notice of what is proposed so that they may be in a
position to make representation. If this essential of justice is ignored and an order to the prejudice of a person is made, the order becomes nullity in the eye of law. Since these essential requirements are not followed in the present case by the respondent-Board, it is difficult to sustain their order which has been notified in the Official Gazette dated 17-7-1997. The reliance placed by learned Counsel Sri Rao on the observations made by Apex Court in the case of M.C. Mehta, supra, is clearly distinguishable inasmuch as in the said decision their Lordships were dealing with different fact situation altogether. Therefore, the said decision would not assist the respondents.
1