Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.19 seconds)
Mukesh Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 July, 2018 cites

Ram Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 12 January, 2010

It is a matter of common knowledge that unfortunately the members of the husband's family are roped in casually, mentioning their names and contents disclose their active involvement. Under these circumstances, it would result in abuse of judicial process. Following the law laid down in the cases of Preeti Gupta & another Vs. State of Jharkhand & another reported as 2010 (7) SCC 667 and Geeta Mehrotra & another Vs. State of U.P. & another reported as 2012 (10) SCC 741, THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.CR.C. No.-15844-2018 (MUKESH YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) M.CR.C. No.-15179-2018 (SMT. MANISHA YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 5 the petition filed by Smt. Manisha Yadav M.Cr.C. No. 15179/2018 is allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 718 - Full Document

Smt. Manisha Yadav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2015

It is a matter of common knowledge that unfortunately the members of the husband's family are roped in casually, mentioning their names and contents disclose their active involvement. Under these circumstances, it would result in abuse of judicial process. Following the law laid down in the cases of Preeti Gupta & another Vs. State of Jharkhand & another reported as 2010 (7) SCC 667 and Geeta Mehrotra & another Vs. State of U.P. & another reported as 2012 (10) SCC 741, THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.CR.C. No.-15844-2018 (MUKESH YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) M.CR.C. No.-15179-2018 (SMT. MANISHA YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 5 the petition filed by Smt. Manisha Yadav M.Cr.C. No. 15179/2018 is allowed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Preeti Gupta & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand & Anr on 13 August, 2010

It is a matter of common knowledge that unfortunately the members of the husband's family are roped in casually, mentioning their names and contents disclose their active involvement. Under these circumstances, it would result in abuse of judicial process. Following the law laid down in the cases of Preeti Gupta & another Vs. State of Jharkhand & another reported as 2010 (7) SCC 667 and Geeta Mehrotra & another Vs. State of U.P. & another reported as 2012 (10) SCC 741, THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.CR.C. No.-15844-2018 (MUKESH YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) M.CR.C. No.-15179-2018 (SMT. MANISHA YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 5 the petition filed by Smt. Manisha Yadav M.Cr.C. No. 15179/2018 is allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1452 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012

It is a matter of common knowledge that unfortunately the members of the husband's family are roped in casually, mentioning their names and contents disclose their active involvement. Under these circumstances, it would result in abuse of judicial process. Following the law laid down in the cases of Preeti Gupta & another Vs. State of Jharkhand & another reported as 2010 (7) SCC 667 and Geeta Mehrotra & another Vs. State of U.P. & another reported as 2012 (10) SCC 741, THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH M.CR.C. No.-15844-2018 (MUKESH YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) M.CR.C. No.-15179-2018 (SMT. MANISHA YADAV Vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) 5 the petition filed by Smt. Manisha Yadav M.Cr.C. No. 15179/2018 is allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1248 - G S Misra - Full Document
1