Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (1.26 seconds)Rob Mathys India Pvt. Ltd. vs Synthes Ag Chur on 29 May, 1997
In Rob Mathys India Pvt. Ltd. v. Synthes Ag Chur, 1997 PTC 664 (supra) - The Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.N. Kapoor of High Court of Delhi observed as under:-
Aktiebolaget Jonkoping Vulcan vs V.S.V. Palanichamy Nadar And Ors. on 6 June, 1968
(3) Aktieboleget Jonkoping v. S. V. Palanichamy Nadar and Ors., AIR 1969 Calcutta 43.- The term "use" was considered and it was construed to the meaning "to be used in India" the High Court of Calcutta made the following observations at para 20 and 27:-"
Section 46 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Corn Products Refining Co. vs Shangrila Food Products Ltd. on 8 October, 1959
In Corn Products Refining Co. v. Shangrila Food Products Limited, AIR 1960 Supreme Court 142: PTC (Suppl)(1) 13 (supra), it was observed as
under at its para 20:-
The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958
Section 8 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Daimler Benz Aktiegesellschaft And ... vs Hybo Hindustan on 10 November, 1993
In Diamler Benz Aktiegesellchaft and Anr. v. Hybo Hindustan (supra)-The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mahendra Narayan of the High Court of Delhi observed as under while deciding the adoption of trade mark BENZ by the defendants in respect of under garments:-
Jugmug Electric & Radio Co. vs Telerad Private Ltd. on 25 October, 1977
(3) Jugmug Electric and Radio Company v. Telerad Private Limited, AIR 1977 Delhi 52 : PTC (Suppl)(1) 767--In this case the appellant obtained registration of the trade mark TELERAD in respect of electric heaters, immersion heaters (electrical), hot plate for cooking, electric toasters, table lamps, heating apparatus and parts thereof included in class 11. The respondents who were already the registered proprietor of the trade mark TELERAD under No. 181813 and 195883 in respect of radio and television included in class 9 failed to oppose the aforesaid registration in favour of the appellants. The respondents initiated the rectification proceedings before the Registrar of Trade Marks who ordered to remove the trade mark of the appellant TELERAD from the register of trade marks. The appellant filed appeal before the High Court of Delhi the High Court held as under:-