Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.78 seconds)
Vikas Kumar vs . State on 25 March, 2009 cites

Vikas Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 10 December, 2008

In my considered view the Ld.MM has erred in passing the -:13:- Cr.R.No.02/07 Vikas Kumar Vs. State order for framing charge against accused-petitioner. Accordingly I allow the petition and set aside the order passed by Ld.MM on 27.05.06 for framing charge against accused-petitioner Vikas Kumar in FIR No.643/03 PS Sultan Puri. TCR be sent back alongwith copy of this order and revision file be consigned to Record Room.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - A Lamba - Full Document

Shri B.P. Saha vs Dr. Vinit Suri And Anr. on 1 September, 2006

8. Relying upon Judgments of Apex Court in 2004(3) RCR (Crl.) 925 (SC) and 2004(3) Apex Criminal 396(SC) it was held by our own Hon'ble High Court in Dr.D.P.Soha vs. Dr.Vinit Suri & Another 2007(1) RCR (Crl.) 443 that to convict a doctor under section 304 A the prosecution has to come out with a case of high degree of negligence on the part of the doctor and that the act complained against the doctor must show negligence or rashness of such a higher degree as to indicate a mental state which can be described as totally apathetic towards the patient. It was held that only such a gross negligence alone is punishable(para 11).
Delhi High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - H R Malhotra - Full Document
1