Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.56 seconds)

Executive Engineer Panchayat(Maa & ... vs Samudabhai Jyotibhai Bhedi & 3 on 7 June, 2017

5. The learned Single Judge having regard to the earlier judgment in the case of Executive Engineer Panchayat (MAA & M.) Department and another vs. Samudabhai Jyotibhai Bhedi, reported in 2017 (4) Page 3 of 8 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:54:21 IST 2022 C/CA/2196/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2022 GLR 2952, State of Gujarat vs. Ranabhai Ajmalbhai Harijan, rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No.1518 of 2017 on 10.04.2018 and the judgment in case of Kanojia Dharmendra Jaysukhlal vs. Gujarat Maritime Board rendered in Special Civil Application No.3756 of 2018 dated 26.10.2018, extended the relief. Having regard to the law laid down by the coordinate Benches as well as the Division Bench of this Court, the learned Single Judge took note of the fact that date of appointment of the petitioner's husband was undisputedly 01.07.1989 and the deceased was extended the benefit of the resolution dated 17.10.1988 and as such turned down the stand of the State which placed reliance on the Government Resolution dated 24.03.2006 as being misconceived. Taking note of the fact that in the connected matter, which has been disposed of and affirmed in the Letters Patent Appeal, the learned Single Judge had taken note of the fact that entire period of service rendered by the employee has to be considered for the purposes of extending pensionary benefits, has Page 4 of 8 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:54:21 IST 2022 C/CA/2196/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2022 allowed the petition and directed the pensionary benefits to be extended to the deceased husband of the petitioner by considering his initial date of appointment as 01.07.1989 and recomputing the same on the basis of revised pay-scale, it came to be held that the deceased employee was entitled to the pay-scale of Rs.2550-3200 in 6th Pay Commission as well as 7th Pay Commission respectively and directed benefits including the family pension to be recomputed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 276 - A Kureshi - Full Document

Kanojia Dharmendra Jaysukhlal vs Mukesh Kumar, Ias, Chief ... on 24 June, 2019

5. The learned Single Judge having regard to the earlier judgment in the case of Executive Engineer Panchayat (MAA & M.) Department and another vs. Samudabhai Jyotibhai Bhedi, reported in 2017 (4) Page 3 of 8 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:54:21 IST 2022 C/CA/2196/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2022 GLR 2952, State of Gujarat vs. Ranabhai Ajmalbhai Harijan, rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No.1518 of 2017 on 10.04.2018 and the judgment in case of Kanojia Dharmendra Jaysukhlal vs. Gujarat Maritime Board rendered in Special Civil Application No.3756 of 2018 dated 26.10.2018, extended the relief. Having regard to the law laid down by the coordinate Benches as well as the Division Bench of this Court, the learned Single Judge took note of the fact that date of appointment of the petitioner's husband was undisputedly 01.07.1989 and the deceased was extended the benefit of the resolution dated 17.10.1988 and as such turned down the stand of the State which placed reliance on the Government Resolution dated 24.03.2006 as being misconceived. Taking note of the fact that in the connected matter, which has been disposed of and affirmed in the Letters Patent Appeal, the learned Single Judge had taken note of the fact that entire period of service rendered by the employee has to be considered for the purposes of extending pensionary benefits, has Page 4 of 8 Downloaded on : Sun Dec 25 03:54:21 IST 2022 C/CA/2196/2022 ORDER DATED: 13/10/2022 allowed the petition and directed the pensionary benefits to be extended to the deceased husband of the petitioner by considering his initial date of appointment as 01.07.1989 and recomputing the same on the basis of revised pay-scale, it came to be held that the deceased employee was entitled to the pay-scale of Rs.2550-3200 in 6th Pay Commission as well as 7th Pay Commission respectively and directed benefits including the family pension to be recomputed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - A S Dave - Full Document
1