Pushkar Narain Sarraf vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 18 January, 1990
In this context, attention was invited to the judgment of Allahabad High Court in the case of Pushkar Narain Saraf (supra). This apart, it was submitted that the presumption under S. 132(4A) is a rebuttable presumption. No adverse inference was drawn about this paper in the proceedings under S. 132(5) and the amount has not been added in the summary order made under S. 132(5). No question was asked about this seized paper in the statement under S. 132(4) or by the Asstt. Director Investigation or Assessing Officer thereafter in the search proceedings.