Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.20 seconds)

Office Of The Chief Post Master & Ors vs Living Media India Ltd.& Anr on 24 February, 2012

We record the relevant dates in detail aforesaid because each part of the delay may not be fatal but total amount of delay as accumulated to 80 days shows lethargy at every stage. The only explanation given by learned counsel for the appellant is slow government machinery which is no more a reason for seeking condonation of delay. The law on this issue stands clearly enunciated by the judgment of the Supreme Court in case Office of the Chief Post Master General & Ors Vs. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. AIR 2012 Supreme Court 1506 observing that there is no need to accept the usual explanation that file was kept pending for several months/years due to considerable degree of procedural red-tape in the process. It has been observed that the Government Departments are under a special obligation to ensure that they perform their duties with diligence and commitment and condonation of delay is an exception and should not be used as an anticipated benefit for government departments. The law of limitation binds everyone equally including government departments.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 1704 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Others vs Parshotam Dass & Another on 2 August, 2010

We may also note that undisputedly the impugned judgment is passed in terms of the judgment of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No. 890 of 2010 titled as State of Punjab and others Vs. Parshotam Dass and another decided on 02.08.2010, as noticed in the impugned judgment and even otherwise the issue is no more res-integra in so far as this Court is concerned.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 6 - A K Goel - Full Document
1