Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.25 seconds)
Jitendra Kumar Pradhan Aged About 31 ... vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 25 August, 2025 cites

Akhilesh Prasad vs Union Territory Of Mizoram on 11 February, 1981

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner next relies upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Akhilesh Prasad vs. Union Territory of Mizoram reported in (1981) 2 SCC 150 and submits that the Central Reserve Police Force (CRFP) squarely falls within the expression of "Armed Forces of the Union" as used in Section 197(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Hence, it is submitted that the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khunti has committed a grave illegality by taking cognizance, even in the absence of sanction for prosecution; by holding that the act of the petitioner was beyond the domain of official duty of the petitioner. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition be allowed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 21 - A D Koshal - Full Document

Sankaran Moitra vs Smt. Sadhna Das & Anr on 24 March, 2006

8. Having heard the rival submissions made at the Bar and after carefully going through the materials available in the record, it is pertinent to mention here that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Sankaran Moitra vs. Sadhna Das & Another reported in (2006) 4 SCC 584 had the occasion to consider the sanction of prosecution required in connection with police officer and in the facts of that case where the petitioner being the police officer used excessive force in course of duty in purported performance of his duty, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India held that there was requirement for sanction of prosecution of the accused person of that case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 35 - Cited by 158 - C K Thakker - Full Document
1