Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)

Tata Tea Ltd. vs Fazlur Rahman on 5 December, 2000

In Tata Tea Ltd. (supra) it was held by this Court that it is in consonance with the view of the Hon'ble Apex Court to pass an order under Section 630(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 to direct an employee or past employee to vacate the flat or to restore the company's property to the company even before the Magistrate trying the case under Section 630(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 formally disposes of the criminal case against such employee. Thereafter the High Court proceeded to direct the employee to vacate the bungalow which was occupied by him, within a period of one month.
Calcutta High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran & Anr vs M/S Xlo India Ltd.& Anr on 13 February, 2009

In Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran (supra) the Hon'ble Apex Court after taking into account the various precedents was of the opinion that the provisions of Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 have been incorporated for the purpose of wrongfully withholding the companies' property and irrespective of any civil suit pending between the parties, a finding can be arrived at by a criminal Court. In the factual backgrounds of the case the Hon'ble Apex Court was pleased to affirm orders/findings passed by the Courts below thereby directing the employee to vacate the premises.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 17 - M Sharma - Full Document
1