Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.33 seconds)N.D.M.C. vs Sohan Lal Sachdev (Dead) Represented By ... on 9 February, 2000
11. In V.Sasidharan vs. M/s.Peter and Karunakar and others {AIR 1984 SC
1700}, which arose under The Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, the
Supreme Court held that a lawyer's office cannot be construed as a commercial
establishment. But the said decision was with reference to the definition of the
expressions "commercial establishment" and "establishment" appearing in Section
2 (4) and (8) of the Kerala Act.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Kerala University Act, 1974
Chairman, M.P. Electricity Board And ... vs Shiv Narayan And Anr on 24 August, 2005
9. The question as to whether the legal profession is a commercial
activity or not was taken up for consideration by the Supreme Court in
M.P.Electricity Board vs. Shiv Narayan {2005 (7) SCC 283}. After analysing the
purport of the expressions "commerce"and "profession", the Supreme Court held in
para 14 of the said decision that "a professional activity must be an activity
carried on by an individual by his personal skill and intelligence" and that
"there is a fundamental distinction between a professional activity and an
activity of commercial character". In para 16 of the judgment, the Court also
held as follows:-
The Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960
The Electricity Act, 2003
Section 61 in The Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 [Entire Act]
Section 29 in The Kerala Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
1