Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)Section 13 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Ram Chander vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) on 4 May, 2009
10. As per the judgment in case of Ram Chander Vs. State
(Govt. of NCT of Delhi) 2009 Crl.L.J. 4058 (Del), to succeed in a
case of bribery, the prosecuting agencies are obligated to prove the
previous demand of bribe, its acceptance and recovery of tainted
money. It was observed that the demand can be proved by the
testimony of the complainant as well from the complaint made by
him. The presumption as to the demand of bribe can be drawn if
the tainted money is recovered from the possession of the accused,
though the presumption is rebuttable.
1