Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.44 seconds)Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980
In GURBAKSH SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB, the Apex Court while dealing with the conditions to be satisfied while exercising discretion under Section 438 of the Code had observed:
Balchand Jain vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 November, 1976
In BALCHAND JAIN Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, AIR 1977 S.C. 366 the Apex Court also observed that Section 438 of the Code is an extraordinary remedy and should be resorted to only special cases and it would be desirable if the Court before passing an order under Section 438 of the Code issues notice to the prosecution to get a clear picture of the entire situation.
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 437 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 504 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Kajad on 6 September, 2001
706 and also STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Vs. KAJAD, 2002 (1) A.L.D. (CRL.) 256 (S.C.) = 2002 (1) A.L.T. (CRL.) 89 (S.C.).
Section 438 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1