Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.73 seconds)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Union Of India & Anr vs Raghubir Singh (Dead) By Lrs. Etc on 16 May, 1989
It was also stated that the petitioners were not parties to the said decision reported in Union of India v. Raghubir Singh, and they were not furnished with also the particulars relating to the cases pending before the Supreme Court relating to the point and consequently, they were not aware as to when the judgment was delivered. In such circumstances, invoking the powers under Article 2262 of the French Civil Code read with Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, the applications were filed for reviewing the judgment and decree in L.A.O.P.Nos.139 and 140 of 1976 dated 26.4.1983.
Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Article 122 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
The Officer On Special Duty(Land ... vs Shah Manilal Chandulal Etc on 9 February, 1996
We are unable to agree with the learned Additional Government Pleader that there is no scope for extending the period made by him by replying upon the decision in Shah Manilal Chanulal's case, . That was a case which concerned the construction of Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the nature of the power that was conferred therein. It is no wonder that the apex court held that it was a statutory power conferred upon the statutory authority and not upon any court and the claim for reference within period striputed being a condition subject to the fulfillment of which only a reference can be sought for and made, there was no scope for extending the period of six weeks provided in Section 18 by invoking or applying the provisions of the Limitation Act, particularly Section 5 of the said Act. The said judgment has no relevance whatsoever to the case on hand.