Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (0.26 seconds)

Dilip S. Dahanukar vs Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr on 10 April, 2007

17. Now we come to the judgment which has been relied on by the   learned   counsel   for   the   appellant,   i.e.,  Dilip   S. Dahanukar (supra).  In the above case this Court had occasion to   interpret   Section   357   Cr.P.C.   The   appellant   therein   was accused   No.2,   who   was   directed   to   pay   compensation   to   the complainant of Rs.15 lakh apart from the simple imprisonment. The facts have been noted in paragraph 3 of the judgment which is to the following effect:
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 268 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 Next