Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.36 seconds)Section 63 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
Section 67 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 59 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925 [Entire Act]
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs B. N. Thimmajamma & Others on 13 November, 1958
124. To sum up, it is enough to refer to one of the
recent decisions of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
117
Kavita Kanwar vs. Mrs. Pamela Mehta and Others
reported in (2021) 11 SCC 209, wherein Hon'ble Apex
Court referred to almost all previous decisions right from
H.Venkatachala Iyengar supra and held that in a given
case a suspicion is created are essentially those where
either the signature of the testator is disputed or the
mental capacity of the testator is questioned. In the matter
of appreciating the genuineness of the execution of a Will,
there is no place for the Court to see whether the
distribution made by the testator was fair and equitable to
all of his children. It is further held that the Court is not
required to apply Article 14 of the Constitution of India, to
dispositions under a Will.
Section 63 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Registration Act, 1908
Shashi Kumar Banerjee & Ors vs Subodh Kumar Banerjee Since Deceased & ... on 13 September, 1963
(3) Shashi Kumar Banerjee and Ors. vs.
Subodh Kumar Banerjee since deceased and
after him his legal representative and Ors. [AIR
1964 SC 529]
(4) Pentakota Satyanrayana and Ors. vs.
Pentakota Seetharatnam and Ors. [AIR 2005 SC
4362].
Pentakota Satyanarayana & Ors vs Pentakota Seetharatnam & Ors on 29 September, 2005
(3) Shashi Kumar Banerjee and Ors. vs.
Subodh Kumar Banerjee since deceased and
after him his legal representative and Ors. [AIR
1964 SC 529]
(4) Pentakota Satyanrayana and Ors. vs.
Pentakota Seetharatnam and Ors. [AIR 2005 SC
4362].