Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)Section 255 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 258 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 428 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Chinnaiah @ Chinnasamy vs State By Inspector Of Police, Tamil Nadu on 18 September, 2003
13. This Court in the case of Chinnasamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and others reported in 1983 STPL (LE-Crim) 15452 Mad has held as follows:-
State Of Maharashtra & Anr vs Najakat Alia Mubarak Ali on 9 May, 2001
17. The ratio of the decision in Najakat Alia Mubarak Ali's case squarely applies to the case on hand. In the instant case while undergoing the substantive sentence in one group of cases, the convict was produced under Prisoner's Transit Warrant in other group of cases and he was treated as remand prisoner in the next group of cases. Though, Petitioner's son was suffering incarceration in connection with other cases as under trial prisoner, he was also in remand in other group of cases. We find no force in the contention of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that while the prisoner is undergoing substantive sentence in one case, he cannot be treated as remand prisoner in another case to invoke the benefit of Sec.428 Cr.P.C."
Raghbir Singh vs State Of Haryana on 13 September, 1984
14. Earlier in Raghbir Singh v. State of Hariyana, 1984 (4) SCC 348 : 1984 SCC (Cri) 616, the Supreme Court has held as under:-
Atul Manubhai Parekh vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 24 November, 2009
11. It is observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Atul Manubhai Parekh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2010 (1) MWN (Cr.) 139 (SC) as follows:-