Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)
State vs . Gaurav Sharma @ Nippal And Ors. on 13 November, 2018 cites

Khujji @ Surendra Tiwari vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 16 July, 1991

26.   It is argued by the Ld. Addl. PP for the State that since   injured   Naresh   had   supported   the   case   of   the prosecution in his examination in chief and he has resiled only in his cross examination, in view of the authoritative judgment   of   Hon'ble   Supreme   Court   titled   as  Khujji   Vs. State of MP AIR 1991 SC 1853, the court can disregard the cross   examination   and   hold   the   accused   persons   guilty believing   the   testimony   of   the   witness   deposed   in   his examination in chief.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 995 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma vs State Of Uttarakhand on 27 September, 2010

Police Station : Aman Vihar  different human emotions. In arriving at a conclusion about the guilt of the accused charged with the commission of a crime, the court has to judge the evidence by the yardstick of   probabilities,   its   intrinsic   worth   and   the   animus   of witnesses.  It  is  settled   law  that   the  burden   of  proof   in   a criminal   trial   never   shifts   and   it   is   always   on   the prosecution to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt on the   basis   of   acceptable   evidence.   It   has   been   so   held   in Paramjeet   Singh   vs.   State.   Of   Uttrakhand   AIR   2011 Supreme Court 200.
Supreme Court of India Cites 42 - Cited by 295 - B S Chauhan - Full Document
1   2 Next