Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)

Jarnail Singh vs Lachhmi Narain Gupta . on 26 September, 2018

"The reqairement of collecting data as tn the backwardness of the Scheduled Castes ari Scheduled Tribes has now been done away with by the latest judgement in JARNATL SINGH and greater emphasis bas been laki on excliding the creamy laver. Reservation in pramotions arsd censequential seniority would therefore have to be extended te these reservation categories only after ecmpletion of the said exercise. Be i noted that in terms of this exercise, the organization would have to quantify the data as to the adequacy of representation of these reservation categorics in the promotional pasts; assess the effect upon the efficiency of administration if such reservation is provided: examine the issne of creamy-layer as laid down in M. NAGARAS and JARNAIL SINGH, apart from the other parameters which have heen {efi antouched or M. NAGARAS, and thereafter confer the benefit of reservation in promotions with or without consequential se niority, as warranted. [tis only the qualification of data with regard fo backwardness of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes that is mow excluded in the light of the later judgement in Ya 4 Cepia pt OPE"
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 221 - R F Nariman - Full Document

K.M.College Of Edu.Muriya Ghatampur ... vs Union Of India Throu Secy. Minorityt ... on 29 July, 2015

2. In this batch of Q.As, the applicants challenge the various orders isstied by the Administration of the South Central Railway (SCR, for short} effecting reservation in promotions, mostly in the category of Drivers and Guards, who are commonly known as Loco staff minning staff. The grievance of the applicants is that the reservations in promotions are being elfected indiscriminately without undertaking any exercise indicated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in M. Negara] & Others vs Union of India & Others { (2006) 8 SCC 212} and that the reservations are being implemented almost at every level of the hierarchy, thereby adversely affecting the chances of promotion of other categories of employees in those cadres. The applicants have furnished the particulars of the respective dates of appointment of themselves and those of the private respondents in the respective O.As to indicate their respective places in the cadre, and have made an attempt to shaw that the private respondents have been conferred with the benefit of promotions, one after the other, to higher levels. The grievance is not only about the promation from an induction stage to higher cadre but also to fee 7 ow en we ahi tos DA/20/1162/2013 & batch further higher cadres on the basis of seniority, which has accrued to the private respondents on account of the promotions made on the basis of reservation. We are not referring to the individual particulars since they are covered by the descriptions given above.
Allahabad High Court Cites 63 - Cited by 1 - R Roy - Full Document
1   2 Next