Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.29 seconds)Article 154 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Tamil Nadu Sugarcane (Regulation of Purchase Price) Act, 2018
U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953
West U.P. Sugar Mills Association vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 22 April, 2020
21. Since the State has chosen to legislate on regulation of price of
sugarcane only in 2018, there can be no imposition of a State levy prior to that
date. This is the substratum of the petitioner’s argument. They have referred to
the judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Tamil Nadu V.
Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Limited1, U.P Cooperative Cane Unions
Federations V. West U.P.Sugar Mills Association2, West Uttar Pradesh Sugar
Mills Association V. State of U.P. (1)3 and West Uttar Pradesh Sugar Mills
Association V. State of U.P. (2)4
1
(1996) 7 SCC 751
2
(2004) 5 SCC 430
3
(2012) 2 SCC 773
4
(2020) 9 SCC 548
13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 16 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. And Anr vs State Of Bihar And Ors on 17 August, 1990
38. The State has also relied upon the judgment in Bharat Coking Coal Ltd.
V. State of Bihar11, wherein at paragraph 19, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held
as follows:
State Of Madhya Pradesh & Anr vs Thakur Bharat Singh on 23 January, 1967
41. The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of
Madhya Pradesh and another V. Thakur Bharat Singh12 assumes importance in
this regard. Paragraphs 6 and 7, wherein the judgment in Rai Sahib Ram
Jawayakapur & Others7 has been distinguished, reads thus: