Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (1.32 seconds)
K V C Janaki Rama Rao vs Reserve Bank Of India on 30 May, 2022 cites

The Cpio, Supreme Court Of India, Tilak ... vs Subhash Chandra Agarwal & Anr. on 2 September, 2009

As emphasized by the Supreme Court in the judgment of Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal in its judgment dated 13.11.2019, right to privacy and right to information have to be treated as co-equals and none can take precedence over the other, rather a balance needs to be struck. The following observations may also be relied upon in that regard:
Delhi High Court Cites 77 - Cited by 2336 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Naresh Trehan vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta on 24 November, 2014

12. In view of the above, the Commission is of the view that these judicial pronouncements have to be factored while deliberating all the claims of the applicant for complete disclosure which may include inadvertent disclosure of financial, transactional and operational data of the clients of the Bank etc. Further, in Naresh Trehan vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta [W.P.(C) 85/2010 & CM Nos.156/2010 & 5560/2011], the Delhi High Court made the following observations:
Delhi High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 565 - V Bakhru - Full Document

Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011

11. Keeping in view the broader nature of business carried out between a customer and the bank, the Commission takes note of the observations passed by the Supreme Court in Central Board Of Sec. Education &Anr. vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors [2011 (8) SCC 497] vide order dated 09.08.2011 examined and explained the expression 'fiduciary relationship', and have illustrated a few relationships where parties were involved in an act of fiduciary capacity including 'customers' in the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 8906 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 Next