Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)
Puthusseri Valiya Veettil Thambayi ... vs Union Of India on 2 June, 2011 cites

Mukund Lal Bhandari And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors on 14 May, 1993

In Mukund Lal Bhandari and others V. Union of India and others (1993 Supp (3) SCC 2) it was held that the payment has to be effected under 'Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme', irrespective of whether the application was accompanied by necessary proof of eligibility or not and the same had to be effected from the date on which the original application was received.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 193 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Kaushalaya Devi on 15 February, 2007

11. Coming to the case in hand, it is very much obvious that the sufferings of the deceased husband of the petitioner/freedom fighter in the jail is authenticated by the 'primary evidence' i.e., jail certificates issued by the concerned jail authorities in respect of the confinement for the period from 28-01-1947 to 16-08-1948. This factual position has been adverted to by this Court in the opening paragraph of Ext.P4 judgment. There is no dispute on the factual position in the counter affidavit. This being the position, the pension that has been given under Ext.P1 Scheme, by passing Ext.P6 order, is on the basis of 'primary evidence' i.e., jail certificate and not on the basis of any secondary evidence of 'co-prisoner's certificate' (CPC) and hence it is not by extending any benefit of doubt, so as to restrict the benefits by giving effect only from the date of the order/Judgment as stipulated by the Supreme Court in Union of India and another V. Kaushalaya Devi ((2007) 9 SCC 525). The said decision itself is an authority that, if the suffering is proved by "primary evidence" (as mentioned in paragraph 5), the claimant is entitled to have the benefit with effect from the date of the application itself, as held by the Apex court in 1993 Supp (3) SCC 2) cited supra.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 44 - M Katju - Full Document

Government Of India Represented Bythe ... vs K.V. Swaminathan on 18 November, 1996

The pension under the Central Scheme was granted therein, confining the benefit only with effect from the date of granting pension, placing reliance on the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in Government of India V. K.V. Swaminathan (1997) 10 SCC 190. It was held that, if the claim was allowed "on the basis of benefit of doubt", the pension should be granted not from the date of application, but from the date of order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 36 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1