Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.33 seconds)The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 115JB in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax on 12 August, 2010
In support of aforesaid
submissions, reliance has been placed on decisions in Godrej &
Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 111/247
Taxman 361/394 ITR 449 (SC) and 'Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT [2017]
86 taxmann.com 49/250 Taxman 532/398 ITR 51 (Delhi).
Eicher Motors Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv, New Delhi on 19 April, 2021
In support of aforesaid
submissions, reliance has been placed on decisions in Godrej &
Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT [2017] 81 taxmann.com 111/247
Taxman 361/394 ITR 449 (SC) and 'Eicher Motors Ltd. v. CIT [2017]
86 taxmann.com 49/250 Taxman 532/398 ITR 51 (Delhi).
Maxopp Investment Ltd.. vs Commr.Of I.T New Delhi on 12 February, 2018
17. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also in the case of Maxopp Investment
Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi [2018] 91
taxmann.com 154 (SC)/[2018] 254 Taxman 325 (SC)/[2018] 402 ITR
640 (SC)/[2018] 301 CTR 489 (SC)[12-02-2018]has categorically
held that recording of the satisfaction is a sine qua non before making
any disallowance where it has been held as under :-
C.I.T.,Mumbai vs M/S.Walfort Share & Stock Brokers P.Ltd on 6 July, 2010
ITA Nos.719 to 721 & 976/Bang/2025
Page 11 of 26
Further the Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock
Brokers P. Ltd. has held that there has to be a proximate cause between
the expenditure and earning of exempt income .
M/S Hindustan Aeronautics Limited , ... vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... on 24 August, 2021
37. The argument of the assessee is that disallowance has been made
without recording a satisfaction by the ld. AO about the correctness of
the claim of the assessee that it has not incurred any expenditure for
earning exempt income. Before us he referred to plethora of judicial
precedents including the decision of Hon'ble jurisdictional High
Court in the case of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd[ supra]