Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.40 seconds)
Nazimuddin vs Rupak Kumar Agrawal on 17 January, 2011 cites

Umesh Kumar & Anr. vs Mohinder Singh & Anr. on 4 January, 2010

He submitted that as the goods delivered to the transporter for being transported to Raipur, were not received, the complainant issued legal notice and thereafter filed complaint. He submitted that in view of Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant is entitled to file complaint before the District Forum as it provides additional remedy. He submitted that the District Forum has properly considered the matter and prayed for dismissing the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent relied on Economic Transport Organization Vs. M/s Charan Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. & Anr. 2010 (2) CPR 181 (SC); Umesh Kumar & Anr. Vs. Shri Mohinder Singh & // 6 // Anr. 2010 (2) CPR 289 and Kaliswari Fire Works Vs. Kamal Enterprises & Ors. III (2010) CPJ 13 (NC).
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Sri Kaliswari Fire Works vs M/S Kamal Enterprises & Others on 19 May, 2010

He submitted that as the goods delivered to the transporter for being transported to Raipur, were not received, the complainant issued legal notice and thereafter filed complaint. He submitted that in view of Section 3 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the complainant is entitled to file complaint before the District Forum as it provides additional remedy. He submitted that the District Forum has properly considered the matter and prayed for dismissing the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent relied on Economic Transport Organization Vs. M/s Charan Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. & Anr. 2010 (2) CPR 181 (SC); Umesh Kumar & Anr. Vs. Shri Mohinder Singh & // 6 // Anr. 2010 (2) CPR 289 and Kaliswari Fire Works Vs. Kamal Enterprises & Ors. III (2010) CPJ 13 (NC).
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1