Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.26 seconds)State Gnct Of Delhi vs Baljeet Singh @ Shankey on 11 July, 2019
2.3 PW-2 i.e. HC Noor Singh stated that on 20.03.2016 he was posted at PS
Khyala as Head Constable and on that day, the investigation of the present case
was entrusted to him after the registration of FIR. After the registration of FIR, he
alongwith Ct. Raj Kumar went to the place of recovery i.e. K-Block, Raghubir
Nagar, Delhi. At the spot, HC Suresh (first IO) was present alongwith Ct. Mahesh.
At the spot, one vehicle i.e. car bearing registration no. DL-3CAY-1364 was
FIR No. 162/16 State Vs Baljeet Singh etc U/s 33/38/58/52 (2) Delhi Excise Act 5
present in the custody of HC Suresh and the recovered liquor was also in his
possession. At the spot, PW-2 prepared the site plan at the instance of HC Suresh
and recorded the statement of HC Suresh u/s 161 Cr.P.C. and thereafter, HC
Suresh was made free from further proceedings. Further, the accused of the case
was searched but there was no clue and in continuation of proceedings, PW-2
alongwith other staff members returned to the police station and deposited the case
property with MHC(M). On 20.04.2016, the registered owner of the vehicle came
to the police station on the notice which was served upon him. The registered
owner, namely, Sushil Mann was duly identified by the witness. The said accused
stated during investigation that he would produce the co-accused. Thereafter, the
accused Baljeet Singh was produced on 25.04.2016 and was arrested and
personally searched. Accused Baljeet Singh was also correctly identified by the
witness. During the investigation of the present case, the accused Sushil Maan
obtained anticipatory bail from the Court and accordingly, he joined the
investigation, was formally arrested and personally searched. During investigation,
the samples taken by HC Suresh were sent to the Excise Lab. The registered
owner's details qua the abovementioned vehicle was collected from the concerned
authority and as per their report, accused Sushil Maan was the registered owner.
After completion of investigation and receiving the excise result, PW-2 filed the
charge sheet against the accused persons. The witness was duly cross examined by
Ld. Counsels for both the accused persons, relevant parts of which have been
reproduced in the reasoning section.