Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.27 seconds)Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 398 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Arms Act, 1959 [Entire Act]
Vadivelu Thevar vs The State Of Madras(With Connected ... on 12 April, 1957
Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2012 (2) RCR (Criminal) 231, Sampath
Kumar Vs. Inspector of Police Krishangiri referring to Vadivelu Thevar v State
of Madras AIR 1957SC614 spoke of three category of witnesses: " those that are
wholly reliable, those that are wholly unreliable and who are neither wholly reliable
nor wholly unreliable. In the case of the first category the courts have no difficulty in
coming to the conclusion either way. It can convict or acquit the accused on the
deposition of single witness if it is found to be fully reliable. In the second category
also there is no difficulty in arriving at an appropriate conclusion for there is no
question of placing any reliance upon a deposition of a wholly unreliable witness. It
is only in the case of witnesses who are neither wholly reliable nor wholly unreliable
that the Courts have to be circumspect and have to look for corroboration in
material particulars by reliable testimony direct or circumstantial."
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Inder Mohan Lal vs Secretary, Delhi Administration And ... on 21 December, 1978
Similarly in Inder Singh & Anr. Vs. The State (Delhi Administration),
(1978) 4 SCC 161 at page 162 the Hon'ble Supreme Court held: