Vinodan T. & Ors vs University Of Calicut & Ors on 26 April, 2002
6. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the
conclusions of the CAT are justified because in the absence of rules or
regulations, the postal department could not have re-evaluated the
answer sheets in respect of any of the tests which were part of the
recruitment process. It was contended next that as regards the
operative directions, the CAT's findings are in consonance with
several rulings of the Supreme Court, particularly Vikas Pratap Singh
W.P.(C) 6505/2013 and connected cases Page 6
and Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 3414;
Vinodan T. and Ors. vs. University of Calicut and Ors. 2002 (4) SCC
726; Girjesh Shrivastava and Ors. vs. State of M.P. and Ors. 2010
(10) SCC 707 and Buddhi Nath Chaudhary and Ors. etc. vs. Abahi
Kumar and Ors. 2001 (2) SCR 18.