Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)

Laxmi Chand vs Comptroller And Auditor General Of ... on 4 November, 2004

In another case the Jabalpur Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Laxmi Chand Vs Comptroller and Auditor General of India 2005 (1) ATJ 31 held that the medical expenses to the retired employee for their indoor treatment has to be reimbursed and it cannot be denied or distinguished merely on the ground that the retired government employees was not a member of CGHS.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Gwalior Cites 8 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

All India Bsnl Pensioner'S Welfare ... vs Union Of India Represented By Its ... on 15 March, 2012

In an another similar case, the Chandigarh Bench of this Tribunal in the case of u.P. Pensioners Welfare Association Vs. Union of India and others 2005 (a) ATJ 460 held that the retirees of the s ame government cannot be divided into categories for r etm . bursement of medical facilities. Learned counsel for the app1icant also placed reliance on the JU · dgement dated 17.11.2016 passed by this Tribunal in O•A • N0 • 8 57 of 2008 wherein this Tribunal quashed the impugned order and 6 directed the respondents to sanction and release the admissible amount to the applicant as medical reimbursement d an pay the same within three months.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 2 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Sh. Mohsin Malik vs Union Of India (Uoi) Through Secretary ... on 6 December, 2007

claim of retired Postal Department employees is reimbursable under cs (MA) Ru 1es 194 7. He placed his reliance on the judgement passed by Ch an d.igarh Bench 5 of this Tribunal in the case of H.S. Malik and others vs. Union of India, wherein the Tribunal held that the CGHS facilities are not available at every nick and corner of the country, hence it cannot be held to be a cause of discrimination and finally observed for reimbursernent of the medical expenses.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1