Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.03 seconds)
The Panchayat Board By Its President, ... vs The Western India Matches Company By ... on 15 December, 1938 cites

Appu L. Rm. Lakshmanan Chetti (Died) And ... vs The Union Board Of Devakottai Through ... on 4 February, 1931

10. It is not necessary to examine the decisions given by other Courts. Reference to the principal decisions elsewhere is to be found in the judgment of Madhavan Nair, J., in Lakshmanan Chetti v. Union Board of Devakottah (1931) 60 M.L.J. 600 and all that need be said here is that they do not throw doubt on the decisions of this Court.
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Mr. Agling, President Of The Taluq ... vs Narayana Chetti on 7 November, 1892

In my opinion the explanation for the insertion of the words "unless it is an action for the recovery of immovable property or for a declaration of title thereto" is that the Legislature had in mind the decision in President of the Taluk Board, Sivaganga v. Narayana Chetti (1892) 3 M.L.J. 13 : I.L.R. 16 Mad. 317, where it was said that the principle embodied in the section could not apply when the object of the suit was to obtain a declaration of title to immovable property and for an injunction to restrain interference with immovable property. It was not realised that the wording might be made the basis of an argument that the statutory notice was necessary for all suits other than those relating to immovable property.
Madras High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1