Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (1.11 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 300A in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905
Telangana Land Encroachment Act, 1905
The Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976
State Of U.P. & Ors vs Maharaja Dharmander Prasad Singh Etc on 17 January, 1989
25. Once it is seen that the petitioner has been dispossessed
otherwise than by due process of law, it should follow as a corollary that
he should be restored to possession. As observed by the Supreme Court
in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Maharaja Dharmandar Prasad Singh1,
relied upon by Mr. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioner, no one can appropriate to himself, the extra judicial right of
re-entry. Even the government cannot resume possession otherwise than
in accordance with law.
Section 6 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Krishna Ram Mahale (Dead), By His Lrs. vs Mrs. Shobha Venkat Rao on 9 August, 1989
26. Again in Krishna Ram Mahale v. Mrs. Shobha Venkat
Rao2, the Supreme Court reiterated that a person who is in settled
possession of a property, cannot be dispossessed except by due recourse
of law, even if that person had no right to remain on the property.