Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (1.60 seconds)
Somabhai Zerabhai Since Decd Through ... vs State Of Gujarat on 8 September, 2022 cites

G. Amalorpavam & Ors vs R.C. Diocese Of Madurai & Ors on 6 March, 2006

Being the final Court of fact, the first appellate court must not record mere general expression of concurrence with the trial Court judgment rather it must give reasons for its decision on such point independently to that of the trial Court. Thus, the entire evidence must be considered and discussed in detail. Such exercise should be done after formulating the points for Page 15 of 31 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 12 20:46:25 IST 2022 C/SA/462/2022 ORDER DATED: 08/09/2022 consideration in terms of the said provisions and the Court must proceed in adherence to the requirements of the said statutory provisions. (Vide: Sukhpal Singh v. Kalyan Singh, AIR 1963 SC 146; Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary, AIR 1967 SC 1124; G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai, 2006 (3) SCC 224; Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari, 2007 (8) SCC 600; and Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari, AIR 2007 (SC 2380: 2007 (10) SCC 296.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 235 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Shiv Kumar Sharma vs Santosh Kumari on 18 September, 2007

Being the final Court of fact, the first appellate court must not record mere general expression of concurrence with the trial Court judgment rather it must give reasons for its decision on such point independently to that of the trial Court. Thus, the entire evidence must be considered and discussed in detail. Such exercise should be done after formulating the points for Page 15 of 31 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 12 20:46:25 IST 2022 C/SA/462/2022 ORDER DATED: 08/09/2022 consideration in terms of the said provisions and the Court must proceed in adherence to the requirements of the said statutory provisions. (Vide: Sukhpal Singh v. Kalyan Singh, AIR 1963 SC 146; Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary, AIR 1967 SC 1124; G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai, 2006 (3) SCC 224; Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari, 2007 (8) SCC 600; and Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari, AIR 2007 (SC 2380: 2007 (10) SCC 296.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 252 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Madhukar And Ors vs Sangram And Ors on 20 April, 2001

The judgment of the appellate Court must, therefore, reflect its conscious application of mind and record findings supported by reasons, on all the issues arising along with the contentions put forth and pressed by the parties for decision of the appellate Court. Sitting as a Court of appeal, it was the duty of the High Court to deal with all the issues and the evidence led by the parties before Page 16 of 31 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 12 20:46:25 IST 2022 C/SA/462/2022 ORDER DATED: 08/09/2022 recording its findings. The first appeal is a valuable right and the parties have a right to be heard both on questions of law and on facts and the judgment in the first appeal must address itself to all the issues of law and fact and decide it by giving reasons in support of the findings. (Vide : Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari, 2001 (3) SCC 179 and Madhukar v. Sangram, 2001 (4) SCC 756."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 383 - B Kumar - Full Document

Thakur Sukhpal Singh vs Thakur Kalyan Singh on 2 May, 1962

Being the final Court of fact, the first appellate court must not record mere general expression of concurrence with the trial Court judgment rather it must give reasons for its decision on such point independently to that of the trial Court. Thus, the entire evidence must be considered and discussed in detail. Such exercise should be done after formulating the points for Page 15 of 31 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 12 20:46:25 IST 2022 C/SA/462/2022 ORDER DATED: 08/09/2022 consideration in terms of the said provisions and the Court must proceed in adherence to the requirements of the said statutory provisions. (Vide: Sukhpal Singh v. Kalyan Singh, AIR 1963 SC 146; Girijanandini Devi v. Bijendra Narain Choudhary, AIR 1967 SC 1124; G. Amalorpavam v. R.C. Diocese of Madurai, 2006 (3) SCC 224; Shiv Kumar Sharma v. Santosh Kumari, 2007 (8) SCC 600; and Gannmani Anasuya v. Parvatini Amarendra Chowdhari, AIR 2007 (SC 2380: 2007 (10) SCC 296.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 195 - R Dayal - Full Document

Santosh Hazari vs Purushottam Tiwari (Dead) By Lrs on 8 February, 2001

The judgment of the appellate Court must, therefore, reflect its conscious application of mind and record findings supported by reasons, on all the issues arising along with the contentions put forth and pressed by the parties for decision of the appellate Court. Sitting as a Court of appeal, it was the duty of the High Court to deal with all the issues and the evidence led by the parties before Page 16 of 31 Downloaded on : Mon Sep 12 20:46:25 IST 2022 C/SA/462/2022 ORDER DATED: 08/09/2022 recording its findings. The first appeal is a valuable right and the parties have a right to be heard both on questions of law and on facts and the judgment in the first appeal must address itself to all the issues of law and fact and decide it by giving reasons in support of the findings. (Vide : Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari, 2001 (3) SCC 179 and Madhukar v. Sangram, 2001 (4) SCC 756."
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 1602 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 3 Next