Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde And ... vs Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale on 25 September, 1959
(b) Satyanarayana Laxminarayan Hegde vs., Mallikarjuna
Bhavanappa Tirumale, reported in AIR 1960 SC 137(142) in support
of the contention eror of law apparent on the face of the record.
D. N. Banerji vs P. R. Mukherjee And Others on 5 December, 1952
(c) D N Banerjee vs., P R Mukherjee, AIR 1953 SC 58, in
support of the contention that high court can interfere when there
is violation of principles of natural justice, this Court can interfere.
Hope Plantations Ltd vs Taluk Land Board Peermade & Anr on 3 November, 1998
(c) Hope Plantations Ltd., Vs., Taluk Land Board, Peermade &
another, reported in (1999) 5 SCC 590 to contend that finding on
interlocutory applications having become final is res judicata, which
cannot be re-agitated at a later stage of same proceedings.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 95 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Trimbak Gangadhar Telang And Anr. vs Ramchandra Ganesh Bhide And Ors. on 19 January, 1977
(d) Trimbak Gangadhar Telang vs., Ramchandra Ganesh
Bhide, reported in AIR 1977 SC 1222 in support of contention,
10
patent or flagrant error in procedure and order resulting in manifest
injustice, this court's interference is warranted.
The Andhra Bank Ltd vs R. Srinivasan And Others on 31 August, 1961
(e) Andhra Bank Ltd., vs., R Srinivasan & others, reported in
AIR 1962 SC 232 in support of the contention that legal
representatives cannot take any plea which the deceased had not or
could not have taken and that the LRs. step into the shoes of the
deceased.